Key result
Continuing perioperative antiplatelet therapy during partial nephrectomy independently predicted bleeding complications (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.06-4.51; P=0.03), a risk seemingly driven by clopidogrel.
Why the study?
Does perioperative continuation of antiplatelet therapy increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy?
Cohort (n=1,097)
Yes
Does perioperative continuation of antiplatelet therapy increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy?
Odds Ratio: 2.19 (95% CI 1.06–4.51)
Absolute Event Rate: 20.9% vs 7.1%
p-value: p=0.03
Continuing aspirin alone during partial nephrectomy does not significantly increase bleeding risk, whereas continuing clopidogrel is associated with increased bleeding complications.
May increase bleeding risk with clopidogrel continuation during partial nephrectomy; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without RCTs.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the risk of bleeding complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy in whom perioperative antiplatelet therapy was continued, as antiplatelet therapy is increasingly used and hemorrhage is a significant concern in partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 2-center retrospective analysis 1,097 patients underwent partial nephrectomy between 2000 and 2014. The cohort was split into 3 groups of perioperative continuation of antiplatelet therapy (group 1-67), antiplatelet therapy stopped preoperatively (group 2-254) and no chronic antiplatelet therapy (group 3-776). Bleeding complications were defined as any transfusion, or any hospital readmission or secondary procedure performed for hemorrhage. Multivariable analysis was performed to elucidate independent risk factors for bleeding complications. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 were older (median age 66 years vs 64 and 57 years in groups 2/3, p <0.0001), and had greater comorbidity (median ASA classification score 3 vs 2 and 2, p <0.0001). Group 1 had a higher rate of bleeding complications (20.9% vs 7.1% and 6.4%, p <0.0001) and transfusions (16.4% vs 5.9% and 5.4%, p=0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed continued antiplatelet therapy was an independent predictor of bleeding complications (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.06-4.51, p=0.03). These findings appear attributable to intraoperative clopidogrel use. On multivariable analysis the use of aspirin alone was not associated with bleeding complications (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.72-3.75, p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of bleeding complications due to antiplatelet therapy use at partial nephrectomy may be due to clopidogrel. The need to continue perioperative aspirin alone does not appear to be a contraindication to the safe performance of partial nephrectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (n=1,097). Perioperative continuation of antiplatelet therapy vs. Antiplatelet therapy stopped preoperatively or no chronic antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Bleeding complications (any transfusion, hospital readmission, or secondary procedure for hemorrhage) (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.06-4.51, p=0.03). Continuing perioperative antiplatelet therapy during partial nephrectomy independently predicted bleeding complications (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.06-4.51; P=0.03), a risk seemingly driven by clopidogrel.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: