Key result
Improved right ventricular function after percutaneous mitral valve repair was associated with a lower risk of death or heart transplantation (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.94; P=0.030).
Why the study?
In patients with HFrEF and secondary mitral regurgitation, impaired RV function worsens prognosis, but the RV response to pMVR and its association with outcomes were not well characterized.
Does improved right ventricular function after percutaneous mitral valve repair reduce the composite of death or heart transplantation in patients with HFrEF and secondary mitral regurgitation?
Cohort (n=221)
Yes
Does improved right ventricular function after percutaneous mitral valve repair reduce the composite of death or heart transplantation in patients with HFrEF and secondary mitral regurgitation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.52 (95% CI 0.29–0.94)
p-value: p=0.030
Early improvement in right ventricular function after percutaneous mitral valve repair is associated with improved long-term survival free from heart transplantation in patients with HFrEF and secondary mitral regurgitation.
AIMS: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), impaired right ventricular function (RVF) may negatively influence the prognosis. Percutaneous mitral valve repair (pMVR) can promote the recovery of RVF. We sought to characterize the response of the right ventricle to pMVR in HFrEF with SMR and to assess the association between improved RVF after pMVR and outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 221 patients with HFrEF and SMR ≥3+ successfully treated with pMVR in four tertiary care centres for heart failure were included. Improved RVF was defined as Δ right ventricular fractional area change (ΔRVFAC) ≥5% at early follow-up (median time 4 months). The primary endpoint was a composite of death/heart transplantation (D/HT). Mean age was 69 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31 ± 8% and mean RVFAC was 34 ± 9%. ΔRVFAC ≥5% occurred in 88 patients (40%) and was independent of the measures of left ventricular reverse remodelling. During a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile range 12-46), 81 patients (37%) reached the primary endpoint. After adjustment for other significant covariates, ΔRVFAC ≥5% was significantly associated with lower risk of D/HT (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.94, P = 0.030). In the secondary outcome analysis exploring the risk of heart failure hospitalizations, ΔRVFAC ≥5% confirmed the prognostic association with the endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFrEF and SMR, about 40% of patients improved RVF after pMVR. RVF improvement was associated with better long-term survival free from HT and lower risk of heart failure hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caiffa et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and secondary mitral regurgitation (n=221). Improved right ventricular function (ΔRVFAC ≥5%) after pMVR vs. No improvement in right ventricular function (ΔRVFAC <5%) was evaluated on Composite of death or heart transplantation (D/HT) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.94, p=0.030). Improved right ventricular function after percutaneous mitral valve repair was associated with a lower risk of death or heart transplantation (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.94; P=0.030).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: