Key result
Hemodialysis was associated with a significantly higher risk of target lesion failure at 3 years compared to non-hemodialysis after PCI with DES for ULMCA lesions (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.75-3.38; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Clinical outcomes after PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery distal bifurcation lesions using drug-eluting stents in hemodialysis patients compared to non-hemodialysis patients required assessment.
Does hemodialysis status worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with DES for unprotected left main coronary artery distal bifurcation lesions compared to non-hemodialysis patients?
Cohort (n=1,416)
Yes
Does hemodialysis status worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with DES for unprotected left main coronary artery distal bifurcation lesions compared to non-hemodialysis patients?
Hemodialysis patients undergoing PCI with DES for left main distal bifurcation lesions have a significantly higher risk of target lesion failure, cardiac mortality, and target lesion revascularization compared to non-hemodialysis patients.
HD patients had higher TLF after DES-PCI for ULMCA bifurcation; leaves open optimal strategies in this high-risk group.
AIMS: We assessed clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) distal bifurcation lesions using drug-eluting stents (DES) in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to non-HD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 1,858 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for ULMCA distal bifurcation lesions at 4 high-volume centers in Japan, Italy, and Taiwan between January 2005 and December 2015. Of them, 1,416 patients were treated with DES including 113 HD patients and 1,303 non-HD patients. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction. HD patients were more likely to be younger and have diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, peripheral artery disease, lower ejection fraction, and higher EuroSCORE. TLF rate at 3 years was significantly higher in HD group than in non-HD group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.43 [1.75-3.38], p < 0.001). Cardiac mortality and TLR rate were also significantly higher in HD group than in non-HD group (adjusted HR 3.85 [2.34-6.34], p < 0.001, and HR 2.10 [1.41-3.14], p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HD was strongly associated with adverse cardiac events after PCI for ULMCA distal bifurcation lesions with DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) distal bifurcation lesions (n=1,416). Hemodialysis vs. Non-hemodialysis was evaluated on Target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.75-3.38, p=< 0.001). Hemodialysis was associated with a significantly higher risk of target lesion failure at 3 years compared to non-hemodialysis after PCI with DES for ULMCA lesions (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.75-3.38; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: