Key result
Ultrathin BP-SES linked to ~86% lower 2-year TLR vs. other DES in hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Hemodialysis is linked to adverse cardiovascular events after PCI, and the usefulness of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in hemodialysis patients was unknown.
Does the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent reduce clinically driven target lesion revascularization in hemodialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to other drug-eluting stents?
Observational (n=156)
No
Does the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent reduce clinically driven target lesion revascularization in hemodialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to other drug-eluting stents?
Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents may improve midterm clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients by reducing target lesion revascularization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support stent selection in hemodialysis PCI patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background: Hemodialysis (HD) is associated with adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (ultrathin strut BP-SES) has had better results in patients undergoing PCI compared with other drug-eluting stents (DES), its usefulness in HD patients is unknown. Methods and Results: This study involved 286 lesions in 162 HD patients who underwent PCI with a DES between January 2018 and June 2022. The incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel failure (TVF: cardiac death, target vessel MI and clinically driven target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was assessed. During a median 636 days, clinically driven TLR occurred in 32 lesions. Clinically driven TLR at 2 years was significantly lower in the ultrathin strut BP-SES group than in the other DES group (2.9% vs. 17.3%, log-rank P=0.028). TVF occurred in 43 patients. The cumulative incidence of TVF was not different between two groups; however, clinically driven TVR was significantly lower in patients treated with the ultrathin strut BP-SES than with other DES (4.5% vs. 25.7%, log-rank P=0.027). In the quantitative coronary angiography analysis, late lumen loss at follow-up was significantly smaller in the ultrathin strut BP-SES group (0.13±0.40 vs. 0.67±1.02 mm, P<0.001). Conclusions: In patients on HD undergoing PCI, the incidence of clinically driven TLR was significantly lower in ultrathin strut BP-SES compared to other DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taninobu et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=156). Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) vs. Other 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents was evaluated on Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-1.00, p=0.028). In hemodialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent was associated with a significantly lower rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 2 years compared to other drug-eluting stents (HR 0.14).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: