Key result
Evidence from genetically modified experimental animals does not support a direct role of the renin-angiotensin system in left ventricular hypertrophy independent of blood pressure lowering.
Why the study?
Does cardiac angiotensin II directly mediate left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis independent of blood pressure?
Does cardiac angiotensin II directly mediate left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis independent of blood pressure?
Evidence from genetically modified animal models suggests that the beneficial cardiac effects of RAS blockers may be primarily due to blood pressure lowering rather than direct cardiac effects of angiotensin II.
ANGIOTENSIN (ANG) II, in addition to its vasoconstrictor effects, is believed to be a direct mediator of left ventricular hypertro-phy and cardiac fibrosis, thus explaining the beneficial cardiac effects of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers in humans. Yet, simultaneously, it has been argued that these effects can simply be attributed to the blood pressure-lowering capacity of RAS blockers. A critical review recently concluded that the bulk of evidence, obtained in genetically modified experimen-tal animals [e.g., overexpressing angiotensinogen, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), or ANG II type 1 (AT1) receptors in the heart], does not support a direct role of the RAS in left ventricular hypertrophy (18). In fact, even transgenic mice expressing an engineered fusion protein designed to directly release ANG II in the heart (using the -myosin heavy chain promoter), despite having 20- to 50-fold elevated cardiac ANG
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A.H. Jan Danser (2010) conducted a review in Left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis. Angiotensin II was evaluated on Left ventricular hypertrophy. Evidence from genetically modified experimental animals does not support a direct role of the renin-angiotensin system in left ventricular hypertrophy independent of blood pressure lowering.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: