Key result
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure compared to medical therapy.
Why the study?
The effect of catheter ablation for AF in patients with heart failure with mid-range or preserved ejection fraction remained unclear.
Does catheter ablation reduce cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction compared to medical therapy?
Cohort (n=899)
Yes
Does catheter ablation reduce cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction compared to medical therapy?
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction is associated with a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to medical therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ablation was associated with fewer CV deaths or HF hospitalizations in matched patients; leaves open confirmation in randomized HFpEF/HFmrEF trials.
BACKGROUND: A recent randomized trial demonstrated that catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF) is associated with a reduction in death or heart failure. However, the effect of catheter ablation for AF in patients with heart failure with mid-range or preserved EF is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We screened 899 AF patients (72.4% male, mean age 68.4 years) with heart failure and left ventricular EF ≥40% from 2 Japanese multicenter AF registries: the Atrial Fibrillation registry to Follow the long-teRm Outcomes and use of aNTIcoagulants aftER Ablation (AF Frontier Ablation Registry) as the ablation group (525 patients who underwent ablation) and the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry as the medical therapy group (374 patients who did not undergo ablation). Propensity score matching was performed in these 2 registries to yield 106 matched patient pairs. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. At 24.6 months, the ablation group had a significantly lower incidence of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.70; P=0.004) than the medical therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation for AF in patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved EF was associated with a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuda et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with mid-range or preserved ejection fraction (n=899). Catheter ablation vs. Medical therapy was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.70, p=0.004). Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and mid-range or preserved ejection fraction reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure compared to medical therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: