Key result
Metabolic syndrome was associated with an increased risk of any coronary plaque (OR 1.606; 95% CI 1.063-2.426; P<0.05), whereas diabetes was linked to mixed, calcified plaques and stenosed segments.
Why the study?
Does the presence of diabetes or metabolic syndrome increase the risk of subclinical coronary stenosis and plaque subtypes in middle-aged individuals with cardiac risk factors?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,024)
No
Does the presence of diabetes or metabolic syndrome increase the risk of subclinical coronary stenosis and plaque subtypes in middle-aged individuals with cardiac risk factors?
In middle-aged individuals with cardiac risk factors, diabetes is associated with a higher risk of mixed/calcified plaques and coronary stenosis, whereas metabolic syndrome is associated with any coronary plaque but not stenosis.
Should not yet change screening practices in at-risk middle-aged adults; hypothesis-generating for differential plaque phenotypes by metabolic status.
AIMS: The presence of subclinical stenosed coronary segments and plaque subtypes has not been compared among those with metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or neither condition in middle-aged individuals. In select, intermediate-risk subjects, it may be reasonable to directly measure atherosclerosis burden by low-dose, multidetector-row computed tomographic coronary angiography. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 1024 consecutive, newly self-referred subjects (692 men, 332 women; mean age 53.0±9.7 years) who underwent health evaluation at the China Medical University Hospital. Participants had at least one cardiac risk factor, but no known coronary heart disease. RESULTS: Among our 1024 subjects, 135 had diabetes, 334 had metabolic syndrome and 555 had neither condition. The subjects with diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome had a higher prevalence of non-calcified, calcified and mixed-type plaques and stenosed coronary segments than the subjects with neither condition (P<0.05). The odds ratios for diabetes and the presence of any plaque, mixed plaque, calcified plaque and stenosed segment compared with neither metabolic syndrome nor diabetes were 2.893, 3.629, 2.099 and 2.036, respectively, all of which were significant (P<0.05). The odds ratio for metabolic syndrome and the presence of any plaque compared with neither metabolic syndrome nor diabetes was 1.606 (95% CI 1.063-2.426; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In middle-aged subjects, diabetes was related to an increased risk of the presence of mixed plaques, calcified plaques and stenosed coronary segments. However, metabolic syndrome was related to an increased risk of the presence of any coronary plaque, but not related to stenosed coronary segments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome and diabetes (n=1,024). Metabolic syndrome and diabetes vs. Neither metabolic syndrome nor diabetes was evaluated on Presence of any coronary plaque (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.063-2.426, p=<0.05). Metabolic syndrome was associated with an increased risk of any coronary plaque (OR 1.606; 95% CI 1.063-2.426; P<0.05), whereas diabetes was linked to mixed, calcified plaques and stenosed segments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: