Key result
Dobutamine-induced contractile reserve assessed by tissue Doppler imaging was higher in stunned myocardium (2.1 cm/s) than in hibernating (1.2 cm/s) or scarred regions (1.3 cm/s).
Why the study?
Does pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging differentiate between stunned, hibernating, and scarred myocardium in patients with reduced left ventricular function due to chronic coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=70)
No
Does pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging differentiate between stunned, hibernating, and scarred myocardium in patients with reduced left ventricular function due to chronic coronary artery disease?
Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging with low-dose dobutamine can quantify contractile reserve and help differentiate stunned from hibernating or scarred myocardium.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid viability assessment in reduced LVEF; hypothesis-generating for tissue Doppler in chronic CAD.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether quantification of myocardial systolic velocities by pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging can differentiate between stunned, hibernating, and scarred myocardium. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 70 patients with reduced left ventricular function caused by chronic coronary artery disease. METHODS: Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging was done close to the mitral annulus at rest and during low dose dobutamine; systolic ejection velocity (Vs) and the difference in Vs between low dose dobutamine and the resting value (DeltaVs) were assessed using a six segment model. Assessment of perfusion (with Tc-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT) and glucose utilisation (by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT) was used to classify dysfunctional regions (by resting cross sectional echocardiography) as stunned, hibernating, or scarred. RESULTS: 253 of 420 regions (60%) were dysfunctional. Of these, 132 (52%) were classified as stunned, 25 (10%) as hibernating, and 96 (38%) as scarred. At rest, Vs in stunned, hibernating, and scar tissue was, respectively, 6.3 (1.8), 6.6 (2.2), and 5.5 (1.5) cm/s (p = 0.001 by ANOVA). There was a gradual decline in Vs during low dose dobutamine infusion between stunned, hibernating, and scar tissue (8.3 (2.6) v 7.8 (1.5) v 6.8 (1.9) cm/s, p < 0.001 by ANOVA). DeltaVs was higher in stunned (2.1 (1.9) cm/s) than in hibernating (1.2 (1.4) cm/s, p < 0.05) or scarred regions (1.3 (1.2) cm/s, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative tissue Doppler imaging showed a gradual reduction in regional velocities between stunned, hibernating, and scarred myocardium. Dobutamine induced contractile reserve was higher in stunned regions than in hibernating and scarred myocardium, reflecting different severities of myocardial damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manolis Bountioukos (2004) conducted an observational in reduced left ventricular function caused by chronic coronary artery disease (n=70). Pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging with low dose dobutamine vs. Resting values was evaluated on Systolic ejection velocity (Vs) and difference in Vs (DeltaVs) between low dose dobutamine and rest (p=<0.001). Dobutamine-induced contractile reserve assessed by tissue Doppler imaging was higher in stunned myocardium (2.1 cm/s) than in hibernating (1.2 cm/s) or scarred regions (1.3 cm/s).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: