Key result
Manual thrombus aspiration was significantly associated with a high intracoronary thrombotic burden compared to no aspiration (98% vs 39.6%; p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Routine manual thrombus aspiration shows no benefit over conventional PCI in STEMI, but its real-world use may correlate with intracoronary thrombotic burden.
Is the use of manual thrombus aspiration associated with a high intracoronary thrombotic burden in patients with STEMI?
Observational (n=173)
Is the use of manual thrombus aspiration associated with a high intracoronary thrombotic burden in patients with STEMI?
Absolute Event Rate: 98% vs 39.6%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In real-world practice, manual thrombus aspiration during primary PCI for STEMI is predominantly used in patients with a high intracoronary thrombotic burden.
High thrombus burden was associated with MTA use in real-world STEMI; supports selective application but leaves causal benefit unproven.
Introduction Although the routine use of manual thrombus aspiration (MTA) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) provides no benefit compared to conventional primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the use of this technique in the real world could be associated with the intracoronary thrombotic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of MTA is directly related to a high intracoronary thrombotic burden as defined by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scale, in patients with STEMI. Methods Descriptive retrospective study of patients with a diagnosis of STEMI, in whom the use of MTA was assessed according to the coronary thrombus grading. Results A total of 173 patients were included, with a mean age of 62 years, of whom 78% were male. Manual thrombus aspiration was performed in 52 (30%) of these patients, 98% (51/52) had a high thrombus burden (TIMI thrombus burden grade > 4), compared to 39.6% (48/121) of the patients who did not undergo MTA. Thus, a high thrombus burden was significantly related to the use of MTA (p<0.0001). There were no ischemic stroke or deaths due to cardiovascular causes in the MTA group during hospitalization. Conclusion A high thrombus burden, as classified by the TIMI scale, was significantly associated with the use of MTA. This technique was not related with any major cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Portillo et al. (2019) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=173). Manual thrombus aspiration vs. No manual thrombus aspiration was evaluated on High intracoronary thrombotic burden (TIMI thrombus burden grade > 4) (p=<0.0001). Manual thrombus aspiration was significantly associated with a high intracoronary thrombotic burden compared to no aspiration (98% vs 39.6%; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: