Key result
Efonidipine inhibited contractions induced by various vasoconstrictors in porcine coronary arteries, with stronger potency against U46619 and ET-1 than high-K+ or 5-HT.
Efonidipine inhibits vasoconstrictor-induced contractions in porcine coronary arteries primarily via L-type Ca2+ channel blockade, with potentially additional mechanisms for U46619 and ET-1.
We studied the effects of efonidipine hydrochloride (efonidipine), a 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative, on contractions induced by high-K+ solution (high K+), serotonin (5-HT), U46619, which is a stable analog of thromboxane A2, and endothelin-1 (ET-1) in comparison with those of nifedipine and nisoldipine in porcine coronary arteries. The effects of the drugs were compared after 1- and 3-h incubations. Efonidipine, nifedipine, and nisoldipine each inhibited the contractions induced by these vasoconstrictors. The inhibition of high-K(+)- and 5-HT-induced contractions by efonidipine, but not by nifedipine and nisoldipine, increased when the incubation time was prolonged, whereas the inhibition of U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions was not altered. The potency of efonidipine on U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions was greater than that of nifedipine and equivalent to that of nisoldipine. Thus the inhibitory effect of efonidipine on U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions seems to be stronger than its effects on high-K(+)- or 5-HT-induced contractions, in contrast to the effects of other dihydropyridines. In an additional series of experiments, efonidipine did not inhibit U46619-induced contractions in Ca2(+)-free solution or in the presence of nifedipine. Moreover, efonidipine did not inhibit the specific binding of [3H]SQ 29,548, a thromboxane A2 antagonist, to porcine coronary arterial membrane. Therefore we think that the inhibitory effect of efonidipine on contractions induced by vasoconstrictors was caused by blockade of Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels. However, some unknown mechanism(s) in addition to this effect on Ca2+ channels may contribute to the effect of efonidipine on U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higashino et al. (1997) studied this question. Efonidipine hydrochloride vs. Nifedipine and nisoldipine was evaluated on Inhibition of contractions induced by high-K+, 5-HT, U46619, and ET-1. Efonidipine inhibited contractions induced by various vasoconstrictors in porcine coronary arteries, with stronger potency against U46619 and ET-1 than high-K+ or 5-HT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: