Key result
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery within fast-track care significantly reduced postoperative hospital stay compared to open surgery (weighted mean difference -1.06; 95% CI, -2.06 to -0.06; p=0.04).
Why the study?
Does laparoscopic colorectal surgery reduce hospital stay, readmission, morbidity, and mortality compared to open surgery in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections within fast-track perioperative care?
Population
313 patients (from 3 RCTs) undergoing elective colorectal resections within fast-track perioperative care
Comparison
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery vs Open colorectal surgery
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports preferring laparoscopy in fast-track colorectal surgery to shorten stays; reinforces combined minimally invasive and enhanced-recovery protocols.
Meta-Analysis (n=313)
Does laparoscopic colorectal surgery reduce hospital stay, readmission, morbidity, and mortality compared to open surgery in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections within fast-track perioperative care?
Mean Difference: -1.06 (95% CI -2.06–-0.06)
p-value: p=0.04
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with fast-track perioperative care significantly reduces postoperative and overall hospital stays compared to open surgery, without increasing morbidity or mortality.
Li et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Elective colorectal resections (n=313). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery vs. Open colorectal surgery was evaluated on Postoperative hospital stay (weighted mean difference -1.06, 95% CI -2.06 to -0.06, p=0.04). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery within fast-track care significantly reduced postoperative hospital stay compared to open surgery (weighted mean difference -1.06; 95% CI, -2.06 to -0.06; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: