Key result
Amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies were comparable in 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure lowering, with a non-significant difference of -1.51 mmHg.
Why the study?
The comparability in BP-lowering efficacy and safety between ACE inhibitor or ARB combinations with calcium-channel blockers versus thiazide diuretics remained under investigation, particularly in Chinese patients.
Does amlodipine/benazepril compared to benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide improve blood pressure lowering and safety in Chinese patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension?
RCT (n=560)
Open-label
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does amlodipine/benazepril compared to benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide improve blood pressure lowering and safety in Chinese patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension?
Amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide provide comparable 24-hour systolic blood pressure reduction, but amlodipine/benazepril is associated with a lower incidence of dry cough.
Either ACEI/CCB or ACEI/thiazide suits initial therapy in Chinese hypertension; confirms comparable ambulatory SBP reduction in this RCT.
BACKGROUND: Current hypertension guidelines recommend combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker with a calcium-channel blocker or thiazide diuretic as initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with monotherapy uncontrolled hypertension. However, to what extent these two different combinations are comparable in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety remains under investigation, especially in the Chinese population. We investigated the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of the amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies in Chinese patients. METHODS: In a multi-center, randomized, actively controlled, parallel-group trial, we enrolled patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension from July 2018 to June 2021 in 20 hospitals and community health centers across China. Of the 894 screened patients, 560 eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine/benazepril 5/10 mg (n = 282) or benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide 10/12.5 mg (n = 278), with 213 and 212 patients, respectively, who completed the study and had a valid repeat ambulatory BP recording during follow-up and were included in the efficacy analysis. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 24 weeks of treatment in 24-h ambulatory systolic BP. Adverse events including symptoms and clinically significant changes in physical examinations and laboratory findings were recorded for safety analysis. RESULTS: In the efficacy analysis (n = 425), the primary outcome, 24-h ambulatory systolic BP reduction, was - 13.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in the amlodipine/benazepril group and - 12.3 ± 1.2 mmHg in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group, with a between-group difference of - 1.51 (p = 0.36) mmHg. The between-group differences for major secondary outcomes were - 1.47 (p = 0.18) in 24-h diastolic BP, - 2.86 (p = 0.13) and - 2.74 (p = 0.03) in daytime systolic and diastolic BP, and - 0.45 (p = 0.82) and - 0.93 (p = 0.44) in nighttime systolic and diastolic BP. In the safety analysis (n = 560), the incidence rate of dry cough was significantly lower in the amlodipine/benazepril group than in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group (5.3% vs 10.1%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies were comparable in ambulatory systolic BP lowering. The former combination, compared with the latter, had a greater BP-lowering effect in the daytime and a lower incidence rate of dry cough. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03682692. Registered on 18 September 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Stage 1 or 2 hypertension (n=560). Amlodipine/benazepril vs. Benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide 10/12.5 mg was evaluated on Change from baseline to 24 weeks of treatment in 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (MD -1.51 mmHg, 95% CI -4.76 to 1.74, p=0.36). Amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies were comparable in 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure lowering, with a non-significant difference of -1.51 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: