Key result
Modified qadSOFA outperforms standard qSOFA for predicting in-hospital mortality with an AUC of ~0.86.
Why the study?
Sepsis has an in-hospital mortality rate up to 40% in abdominal sepsis requiring emergency general surgery, but the qSOFA score has not been studied in these patients.
Does the modified qadSOFA score improve mortality prediction compared to the standard qSOFA score in adult patients undergoing abdominal emergency general surgery?
Cohort (n=578)
No
Does the modified qadSOFA score improve mortality prediction compared to the standard qSOFA score in adult patients undergoing abdominal emergency general surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.8 (95% CI 1.2–2.8)
p-value: p=0.007
The modified qadSOFA score demonstrated excellent predictive power for mortality in emergency general surgery patients, outperforming the standard qSOFA score.
May enhance risk stratification in emergency general surgery; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a highly prevalent condition and is associated with a reported in-hospital mortality rate up to 40% in patients with abdominal sepsis requiring emergency general surgery (EGS). The quick sequential organ failure assessment score (qSOFA) has not been studied for EGS patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in adult patients undergoing abdominal EGS at a university tertiary care center from 2016 to 2018. The primary outcome was mortality. The effect of clinical variables on outcomes was assessed in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Based on these results, the qSOFA score was modified. The performance of scores was assessed using receiver operating characteristics. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-eight patients undergoing abdominal EGS were included. In-hospital mortality was 4.8% (28/578). Independent predictors for mortality were mesenteric ischemia (odds ratio [OR] 15.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-48.6; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal tract perforation (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.7-14.0; p = 0.003), 65 years or older (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.5-11.4; p = 0.008), and increasing qSOFA (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.8; p = 0.007). The modified qSOFA (qadSOFA) was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the qSOFA and qadSOFA for mortality was 0.715 and 0.859, respectively. Optimal cutoff value was identified as qadSOFA ≥ 3 (Youden Index 64.1%). CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the qSOFA as a predictor for clinical outcomes in EGS. Compared with the qSOFA, the new qadSOFA revealed an excellent predictive power for clinical outcomes. Further validation of qadSOFA is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test/criteria; Level II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magyar et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in abdominal sepsis requiring emergency general surgery (n=578). Increasing qSOFA score was evaluated on mortality (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8, p=0.007). The modified qadSOFA score demonstrated excellent predictive power for in-hospital mortality in emergency general surgery patients (AUC 0.859) compared to the standard qSOFA (AUC 0.715).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: