Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 1992AnesthesiologyOpen Access

Clinical Recovery and Psychomotor Function after Brief Anesthesia with Propofol or Thiopental

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Propofol reduces time to stand steadily by ~47% versus thiopental and shortens psychomotor impairment.

  • P<0.05
  • n=12

Why the study?

Does propofol improve clinical recovery and psychomotor function compared to thiopental in healthy volunteers?

Population

12 healthy volunteers

Comparison

Propofol (2.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg 3 min later) vs Thiopental (5.0 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg 3 min later)

Design

RCT, crossover, double-blind

Follow-up

7 hours

Authors

KKK. KorttilaUniversity of IowaENE. NuottoUniversity of HelsinkiJLJ. Lance LichtorYale University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Propofol enables faster recovery after brief anesthesia; confirms its preference over thiopental for ambulatory procedures in healthy adults.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=12)

Blinding

Double-blind

Structured PICO

Does propofol improve clinical recovery and psychomotor function compared to thiopental in healthy volunteers?

P
Population
12 healthy volunteers undergoing brief anesthesia with propofol or thiopental, followed for 7 hours.
I
Intervention
Propofol (2.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg 3 min later)
C
Comparator
Thiopental (5.0 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg 3 min later)
O
Outcome
Clinical recovery (time to respond to command, sit, and stand steadily) and psychomotor function at 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 7 hourssurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 62%

p-value: p=<0.05

Propofol allows for significantly faster clinical recovery and return of psychomotor function compared to thiopental, making it suitable for brief ambulatory surgery.

Cite This Study

Korttila et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=12). Propofol vs. Thiopental was evaluated on Time until standing steadily (p=<0.05). Brief anesthesia with propofol resulted in significantly faster time until standing steadily (33 vs 62 minutes; P<0.05) and shorter duration of psychomotor impairment compared to thiopental.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa1fef9d4bb6c013cb2ad7ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199205000-00003
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recovery of psychomotor function following general anaesthesia in children: a comparison of propofol and thiopentone/halothane1996 · 12 citations
  2. 2Pharmacodynamic properties of propofol during recovery from anaesthesia1992 · 7 citations
  3. 3Propofol in short gynaecological procedures1991 · 59 citations
  4. 4Double-blind Comparison of Patient Recovery after Induction with Propofol or Thiopentone for Day-case Relaxant General Anaesthesia1992 · 69 citations
  5. 5Thiopentone or propofol for induction of isoflurane‐based anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery?1992 · 67 citations