Key result
Higher baseline GDF-15 was associated with increased risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.66-18), and dapagliflozin provided consistent relative benefit across GDF-15 levels.
Why the study?
GDF-15 is associated with adverse outcomes in HF, but its relationship with clinical characteristics, outcomes, and the therapeutic effects of dapagliflozin in patients with HFrEF needed evaluation.
Does dapagliflozin reduce worsening HF or cardiovascular death across different baseline GDF-15 levels in patients with HFrEF?
RCT
Does dapagliflozin reduce worsening HF or cardiovascular death across different baseline GDF-15 levels in patients with HFrEF?
GDF-15 is a strong prognostic marker in HFrEF, and while dapagliflozin provides greater absolute clinical benefit in patients with higher GDF-15 levels, it does not lower GDF-15 concentrations.
BACKGROUND: Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, a stress-induced cytokine implicated in systemic energy homeostasis, is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the associations between baseline GDF-15 and the clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction in the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-outcomes in Heart Failure) trial. The effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on circulating GDF-15 levels and the effect of dapagliflozin on clinical outcomes in relation to baseline GDF-15 concentrations were also examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: DAPA-HF was a randomized trial of dapagliflozin in patients with HF and LVEF ≤ 40%. GDF-15 was measured at baseline and 12 months. The primary outcome was the composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. The median baseline GDF-15 level was 1888 (IQR: 1323-2755) pg/mL. Higher GDF-15 levels were associated with older age, lower body mass index, and greater HF symptom burden. There was a stepwise increase in adjusted risk for the primary outcome across quartiles of baseline GDF-15 (adjusted hazard ratio [Q4 vs Q1] 2.30, 95% CI 1.66-18; P trend < 0.001). Dapagliflozin did not significantly change GDF-15 concentrations over 12 months, compared to placebo (placebo-corrected relative change +4%; 95% CI, -2% to +10%). The relative effect of dapagliflozin on the primary outcome was consistent across GDF-15 quartiles (P interaction = 0.96), with a greater absolute benefit in those with higher GDF-15 (P trend < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In DAPA-HF, GDF-15 was independently prognostic of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. Absolute risk reduction with dapagliflozin was greater in patients with higher baseline GDF-15, but the benefit was not associated with an effect on GDF-15 itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berg et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Dapagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.66-18, p=< 0.001). Higher baseline GDF-15 was associated with increased risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.66-18), and dapagliflozin provided consistent relative benefit across GDF-15 levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: