Key result
Transapical ViV-TAVR with a left main snorkel stent succeeds despite severe peripheral vascular disease.
Why the study?
Transapical TAVR allows for TAVR in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease who are ineligible for transfemoral access, but it has rarely been used in the ViV-TAVR setting, especially with concomitant PCI.
Case Report (n=1)
Transapical ViV-TAVR with concomitant PCI is a feasible alternative for patients with severe prosthetic valve degeneration who are ineligible for transfemoral access due to severe peripheral vascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates feasibility of transapical ViV-TAVR plus PCI in select high-risk patients; leaves open need for prospective data before wider adoption.
BACKGROUND Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used, as older high-risk patient populations require repeat aortic valve replacements. The most common approach to ViV-TAVR is through a transfemoral approach or alternative vascular access sites, such as transcarotid or transsubclavian TAVR. Within this population, some patients become ineligible for ViV-TAVR due to contraindications, such as severe peripheral vascular disease, necessitating an alternative. Transapical TAVR allows for TAVR even in the context of severe peripheral vascular disease, although it has rarely been used in the ViV-TAVR setting, and even less frequently with concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 79-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease and aortic valve disease 9 years after coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement presenting with progressive dyspnea on exertion. The patient was found to have severe prosthetic valve degeneration but had a high preoperative surgical risk score and severe peripheral arterial disease. Transfemoral, carotid, and subclavian access were contraindicated given the severe vascular disease, and therefore the patient underwent transapical ViV-TAVR with a 26-mm Sapien S3 valve and a left main coronary artery snorkel stent for protection of the left main coronary. CONCLUSIONS With this rare documented case of transapical ViV-TAVR, we highlight the importance of having several available alternative surgical approaches to TAVR for patients who are ineligible for transfemoral ViV-TAVR and have high preoperative risk scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watkins et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Severe prosthetic valve degeneration (n=1). Transapical valve-in-valve TAVR with a 26-mm Sapien S3 valve and a left main coronary artery snorkel stent was evaluated. Transapical valve-in-valve TAVR with a left main coronary artery snorkel stent was successfully performed in a 79-year-old man with severe peripheral vascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: