Key result
TAVR in patients with a prosthetic mitral valve has similar mortality and morbidity compared to TAVR without a prosthetic mitral valve, but interference risk is high when the aorto-mitral angle is 90° and distance is <7 mm.
Why the study?
Previous surgical mitral valve replacement may increase the risk of device malposition, mechanical valve leaflet stuck, or paravalvular leakage during TAVR.
Is TAVR safe in patients with a prosthetic mitral valve compared to those without?
Is TAVR safe in patients with a prosthetic mitral valve compared to those without?
TAVR appears safe in patients with prior mitral valve replacement, but careful preoperative multi-modality imaging is crucial to assess aorto-mitral anatomy and prevent valve interference.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an alternative procedure for treating aortic stenosis in patients with advanced age and comorbidities. Although patients with previous surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR) are also indicated for TAVR, there might increase the risk of malposition of device, stuck of mechanical valve leaflet, or paravalvular leakage (PVL). My objective is to review the risk of TAVR in patients with prosthetic mitral valve with some experimental study. TAVR patients with prosthetic mitral valve had similar mortality and morbidity compared with TAVR without prosthetic mitral valve. Transcatheter heart valve (THV) migration or interaction to mitral prosthetic valve was rare. Interference of THV with prosthetic valve was high when aorto-mitral angle was less than 90° and mitral prosthesis distance was less than 7 mm in my experimental study in vitro. Anatomically implanted bileaflet valve (oriented like anterior and posterior mitral valve) or anti-anatomically implanted single tilting disc valve (major orifice opening to the left ventricular outflow tract) is a risk of impingement and stuck with THV. Preoperative evaluation of aorto-mitral anatomy and prosthetic valve implantation method by multi-modalities are important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junjiro Kobayashi (2021) conducted a review in Aortic stenosis with preexisting prosthetic mitral valve. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. TAVR without prosthetic mitral valve was evaluated on Mortality and morbidity. TAVR in patients with a prosthetic mitral valve has similar mortality and morbidity compared to TAVR without a prosthetic mitral valve, but interference risk is high when the aorto-mitral angle is 90° and distance is <7 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: