Key result
Modified vacuum-assisted apical resection achieves highly reproducible LV resection and complete cardiac regeneration.
Why the study?
Current rodent left ventricle apical resection methods are relatively difficult to operate reproducibly, prompting the development of a modified method with high accuracy and reproducibility in neonatal mice and rats.
A modified vacuum-assisted apical resection model improves the accuracy and reproducibility of studying cardiac regeneration in neonatal rodents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support clinical translation yet; extends precision of neonatal rodent regeneration models but remains hypothesis-generating.
Neonatal mouse heart can regenerate after left ventricle (LV) apical resection (AR). Since current AR rodent method is accomplished by resecting LV apex until exposure of LV chamber, it is relatively difficult to operate reproducibly. We aimed to develop a modified AR method with high accuracy and reproducibility and to investigate whether cardiac regenerative capacity could be replicated in neonatal rats. For 15% AR of whole heart weight in 1-day-old (P1) neonatal mice, a modified 10 μL pipette tip cut to 0.48 mm in internal diameter was connected to a vacuum pump working at 0.06 ± 0.005 MPa and gently kept in touch with LV apex for nearly but no more than 12 s. LV apex was resected by a single incision adjacent to the pipette tip. The modified AR method in P1 mice achieved cardiac structural and functional recovery at 21 days post resection (dpr). Data from different operators showed smaller variation of resected LV apex and higher reproducibility using the modified AR method. Furthermore, we showed that 5% AR of whole heart weight in P1 neonatal rats using a modified 200 μL pipette tip cut to 0.63 mm in internal diameter led to complete regeneration of LV apex and full preservation of cardiac function at 42 dpr. In conclusion, the modified AR rodent model leads to accurate resection of LV apex with high homogeneity and reproducibility and it is practically convenient for the study of structural, functional, and molecular mechanisms of cardiac regeneration in both neonatal mice and rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bei et al. (2023) studied Cardiac regeneration. Modified apical resection using a vacuum-connected pipette tip vs. Sham surgery or conventional apical resection was evaluated on Cardiac structural and functional recovery and reproducibility of resected area.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: