PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2026Animal Behaviour2 citationsOpen Access

Maternal style does not predict infant growth and survival in wild Guinea baboons

View Full Paper
ADAnaïs Avilès de DiegoFPFederica Dal PescoRMRoger Mundry

Key Points

  • To determine whether variation in maternal care behaviors predicts infant growth rates and survival outcomes in wild Guinea baboons (Papio papio).
  • Quantified maternal style across N = 80 infants in a wild Guinea baboon population, using a statistical framework to control for infant age-related behavioral changes.
  • Evaluated infant forearm growth using Parallel Laser Photogrammetry in N = 50 infants and survival across N = 63 infants, incorporating maternal age, infant sex, and NDVI.
  • Observed only moderate behavioral variation among mothers, with maternal style exhibiting no predictive relationship with infant growth rate or survival probability.
  • Infant sex, maternal age, and NDVI variation failed to predict infant growth or survival in this high-carrying-capacity habitat.

Abstract

Abstract Primate infants depend on their mothers for nursing, transportation, and survival, but also benefit from other behaviours such as contact, protection, and the mother serving as a model for social learning. During infancy, variation in maternal care (“maternal style”) can have profound consequences for infant development and survival. We investigated the link between maternal style and infant growth and survival in wild Guinea baboons ( Papio papio ). This species lives in a tolerant social system with female-biased dispersal. We used data from N = 80 infants to assess variation in maternal style. The final statistical models comprised data from N = 50 infants for the growth analysis based on Parallel Laser Photogrammetry (PLP) measures of forearm length, and N = 63 infants for the survival analysis. To account for heterogeneity in data, we applied a recently established statistical framework that controls for variation in maternal behaviour with infant age. We found only moderate variation among mothers and no evidence for a link between maternal style and infant growth or survival. Neither infant sex, maternal age, nor NDVI variation, a measure later shown to be a poor indicator of food availability, predicted infant growth or survival. We suspect that, in this population living in a habitat with high carrying capacity, disease and predation have greater effects on infant growth and survival than maternal behaviour. Future studies should consider the interplay between infant behaviour and maternal responses in greater detail to better understand variation in early social development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diego et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa27a0b58559d80afc72a87https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2026.123701
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper