Key result
In patients with PFO-associated stroke, intracardiac echocardiography detected a large right-to-left shunt more frequently than combined TTE and TEE.
Why the study?
Certain PFO characteristics identify patients who may derive the highest clinical benefit from percutaneous closure, prompting a comparison of ICE with standard echocardiography to evaluate high-risk characteristics and RLS severity in PFO-associated stroke.
Does intracardiac echocardiography improve the detection of large right-to-left shunts and high-risk PFO characteristics compared to TTE and TEE in patients with PFO-associated stroke?
Observational (n=51)
No
Does intracardiac echocardiography improve the detection of large right-to-left shunts and high-risk PFO characteristics compared to TTE and TEE in patients with PFO-associated stroke?
ICE is superior to TTE and TEE for detecting large right-to-left shunts and high-risk PFO characteristics in patients with PFO-associated stroke, potentially altering clinical risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ICE for shunt assessment in PFO stroke; leaves open effects on risk stratification or closure decisions.
INTRODUCTION: Certain patent foramen ovale (PFO) characteristics, such as a large right-to-left shunt (RLS) or atrial septal aneurysm, identify patients who may receive the highest clinical benefit from percutaneous PFO closure. This study aimed to compare intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) with standard echocardiographic imaging in the evaluation of high-risk PFO characteristics and RLS severity in patients with PFO-associated stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent percutaneous PFO closure for PFO-associated stroke and received all three ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modalities and had interpretable results (N = 51). We then compared RLS severity, high-risk PFO characteristics, and the proportion of patients with a higher likelihood of PFO-associated stroke by ICE versus transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). RESULTS: The final cohort had a mean (±SE) age of 48.4 (±1.8) years and was predominantly female (58.8%). ICE was more likely to identify a large RLS versus TTE/TEE combined (66.7% vs. 45.1%; p = 0.03). The use of ICE resulted in significantly more patients being reclassified as having a higher likelihood of PFO-associated stroke (TTE vs. TEE vs. ICE: 10.4% vs. 14.6% vs. 25%; p = 0.03). A high-quality bubble study was found to be the single most important factor associated with identifying a larger RLS across all modalities (ρ [p]; TTE: 0.49 [<0.001], TEE: 0.60 [<0.001], ICE: 0.32 [0.02]). The presence of a hypermobile septum was associated with significantly greater RLS on ICE (ρ [p]: 0.3 [0.03]), especially with poor quality bubble studies (ρ [p]: 0.49 [0.02]). CONCLUSION: In this observational study of patients with PFO-associated stroke, ICE detected a large RLS more frequently than TTE and TEE; and reclassified some patients as having a higher likelihood of PFO-associated stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaturvedi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in PFO-associated stroke (n=51). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was evaluated on Identification of a large right-to-left shunt (RLS) (p=0.03). In patients with PFO-associated stroke, intracardiac echocardiography detected a large right-to-left shunt more frequently than combined TTE and TEE.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: