Key result
Carotid artery stenting with modern stent designs and protection devices offers a minimally invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy with comparable acute and long-term outcomes.
This review highlights that advancements in stent design and embolic protection devices have made carotid artery stenting a safe and effective alternative to carotid endarterectomy.
May support CAS as less invasive option with comparable outcomes; leaves open need for updated RCTs in contemporary practice.
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an alternative option to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for significant carotid stenosis, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Comparing to CEA, CAS offers significant advantages. The most important arise from the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, which reduces the surgical complications and adds significant comfort to the patient, without compromising the efficacy. Nowadays, CAS can achieve acute and long-term outcome results comparable to CEA, maintaining low rates of periprocedural embolic events. Evolution of the stent design and routine application of protection devices, played an important role to CAS performance. In this review, we aim to present all available new data on stent design and protection devices while we pose a set of unanswered questions that need to be addressed in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikas et al. (2017) conducted a review in Significant carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) vs. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was evaluated. Carotid artery stenting with modern stent designs and protection devices offers a minimally invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy with comparable acute and long-term outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: