Key result
New apex-ejecting rat heart model maintains coronary autoregulation and avoids transient hypoxia versus standard preparations.
The novel apex-ejecting rat heart preparation allows for independent control of aortic perfusion pressure and afterload, providing a more stable model for studying coronary autoregulation and oxygen extraction without transient hypoxia.
Does not inform clinical care; leaves open whether apex-ejecting models advance coronary autoregulation research.
The isolated perfused rat heart is an important experimental preparation for both mechanical and biochemical studies. In order to define better the relationship between coronary flow and loading conditions, a new preparation was developed in which the left ventricle ejected through the apex, while the aortic perfusion pressure could be separately controlled at a higher level than the apex afterload. Results were compared with a standard aortic perfused and ejecting preparation. All analyses were made at low calcium concentration (1.6 mmol X litre-1) for reducing cardiac performance. Coronary flow was related to perfusion pressure in the aortic ejecting preparation when the aortic afterload chamber was between 6.0 and 9.3 kPa (45 and 70 mmHg). Coronary autoregulation was demonstrable in the apex ejecting preparation irrespective of the height of the apex afterload chamber and the aortic ejecting preparation when the aortic chamber was between 11.0 and 16.0 kPa (83 and 120 mmHg). Following the addition of 10(-6) mol X litre-1 adenosine, there was significant coronary vasodilatation, and flow became pressure dependent in all cases. In the apex-ejecting preparation, with a high aortic pressure, coronary flow remained at relatively fixed level, and increases in oxygen demand were met by increasing oxygen extraction. Thus, in this preparation oxygen extraction was directly related to workload. With abrupt increases in afterload, going from 6.0 to 9.3 kPa (45 to 70 mmHg) to a higher level, there was evidence of transient hypoxia with the aortic ejecting but not the apex ejecting preparation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wikman‐Coffelt et al. (1983) studied this question. Apex-ejecting perfused rat heart preparation vs. Standard aortic perfused and ejecting preparation was evaluated on Relationship between coronary flow and loading conditions. A new apex-ejecting perfused rat heart preparation demonstrated coronary autoregulation irrespective of apex afterload and avoided transient hypoxia seen with abrupt afterload increases in standard preparations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: