Key result
Elevated NT-proBNP linked to ~112% higher all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shock in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Does elevated NT-pro BNP increase the risk of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shock in patients with HFrEF receiving primary prevention ICD therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=5,117)
Does elevated NT-pro BNP increase the risk of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shock in patients with HFrEF receiving primary prevention ICD therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 2.12 (95% CI 1.53–2.93)
p-value: p=<0.001
Elevated NT-pro BNP levels demonstrate a positive concentration-dependent association with all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks in HFrEF patients, with risk increasing steeply above 3000 pg/mL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May refine risk stratification in HFrEF ICD recipients; extends observational data but leaves practice change open.
Prameswari et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving primary prevention ICD therapy (n=5,117). Elevated NT-pro BNP levels vs. Lower NT-pro BNP levels was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.93, p=<0.001). Elevated NT-pro BNP levels were associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.53-2.93; p<0.001) and appropriate ICD shock in patients with HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: