Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan linked to a ~7-point KCCQ-12 score improvement in CRT non-responders.
Why the study?
Clinical management of CRT non-responders is difficult and their prognosis is poor, with uncertain effects of sacubitril/valsartan on quality of life.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve quality of life and reduce hospitalizations in CRT non-responders?
Observational (n=35)
Open-label
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve quality of life and reduce hospitalizations in CRT non-responders?
Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves quality of life and reduces hospitalizations in patients who do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Sacubitril/valsartan may improve QoL in CRT non-responders; leaves open whether randomized trials will confirm benefit.
BACKGROUND: Clinical management of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) non-responders is difficult, and their prognosis is poor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether treatment with sacubitril/valsartan can improve quality of life (QoL) parameters in these patients. METHODS: Thirty five non-responders to CRT were included (75 ± 7 years, 28% females, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 28 ± 8%, 54% non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) with maximally optimized drug therapy and New York Heart Association class II-III. They were all on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers and were switched to sacubitril/valsartan. One week before and 6 months after initiation of the therapy they completed both the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) and the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ-12). The primary outcome was the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the physical, clinical, social and emotional QoL parameters and number of hospitalizations. RESULTS: The mean total scores of both questionnaires improved from baseline to the follow-up visit at 6-months (KCCQ-12 40 ± 10 to 47 ± 10; p < 0.001; MLWHF 40 ± 15 to 29 ± 15; p < 0.001). The best results were seen in the KCCQ-12 total symptom domains (77% improvement), the MLWHF physical domain (81% improvement), and the MLWHF emotional domain (71% improvement). Two patients died during follow-up. The mean number of hospitalizations reduced significantly (1 ± 0.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.003) CONCLUSIONS: In CRT non-responders, sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved overall QoL, physical limitations and emotional domains and reduced the number of hospitalizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campal et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure (cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responders) (n=35). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Baseline (ACEI/ARB) was evaluated on KCCQ-12 overall summary score (p=<0.001). In cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responders, sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved the mean KCCQ-12 overall summary score from 40 to 47 and the MLWHF total score from 40 to 29.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: