Key result
Sustained handgrip abolishes exercise-induced hyperaemia in active muscle despite large increases in mean arterial pressure.
Why the study?
Does the exercise pressor response to sustained handgrip augment blood flow in the contracting forearm skeletal muscle?
Population
Subjects undergoing sustained handgrip exercise (demographics and sample size not specified in abstract)
Comparison
Sustained handgrip at 15%, 30%, and 45% of… vs Rest (baseline)
Design
Other
Follow-up
3 minutes
Authors
Loading...
Challenges prior assumptions on pressure-driven muscle perfusion during intense isometric exercise; hypothesis-generating for local vascular regulation mechanisms.
Does the exercise pressor response to sustained handgrip augment blood flow in the contracting forearm skeletal muscle?
p-value: p=< 0.05
At handgrip levels above 15% MVC, reflex increases in blood pressure do not augment blood flow in the active skeletal muscle, challenging previous concepts based on whole-forearm measurements.
Hansen et al. (1993) studied this question. Sustained handgrip (SHG) vs. Rest was evaluated on Muscle blood flow (measured by 133Xenon washout from the extensor carpi radialis longus muscle) (p=< 0.05). Sustained handgrip at 30% and 45% of maximal voluntary contraction abolished exercise-induced hyperaemia in the active muscle despite large increases in mean arterial pressure.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: