Key result
Intracoronary adenosine highly correlates with IV FFR despite suboptimal hyperemia in ~8% of lesions.
Why the study?
Does intracoronary adenosine provide equivalent fractional flow reserve measurements compared to intravenous adenosine in patients with coronary lesions?
Population
52 patients with 60 coronary lesions undergoing fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement
Comparison
Intracoronary adenosine boluses vs Intravenous adenosine continuous infusion at a…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Intracoronary adenosine may suffice for most FFR assessments with fewer side effects; leaves open equivalence in all lesions pending prospective validation.
Does intracoronary adenosine provide equivalent fractional flow reserve measurements compared to intravenous adenosine in patients with coronary lesions?
Mean Difference: -0.004
p-value: p=<.001
Intracoronary adenosine is equivalent to intravenous infusion for FFR determination in most patients and has fewer side effects, though it may yield suboptimal hyperemia in a small percentage of cases.
Jeremias et al. (2000) studied Coronary stenosis (n=52). Intracoronary (IC) adenosine vs. Intravenous (IV) adenosine was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement agreement (Mean difference -0.004, p=<.001). Intracoronary adenosine yielded FFR measurements highly correlated with intravenous infusion (R=0.978, P<0.001), though 8.3% of lesions had a suboptimal hyperemic response with the intracoronary route.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: