Key result
Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V2 predicts ajmaline-induced Brugada response with 100% specificity.
Why the study?
What are the baseline ECG predictors of a positive Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge in patients with suspected Brugada syndrome?
Observational (n=103)
What are the baseline ECG predictors of a positive Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge in patients with suspected Brugada syndrome?
Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in the high right precordial lead (-2V2) is a highly specific predictor of a positive Brugada response to ajmaline challenge.
AIM: To identify ECG predictors of Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge. METHODS: We studied prospectively 103 patients (M = 76, 45 +/- 13 years) in whom ECGs were collected during ajmaline challenge. ECG recordings included the high right precordial leads (-2V(1) and -2V(2)). A positive response was defined by a >0.2 mV J point or ST segment elevation and a down-sloping pattern of the ST segment in at least one right precordial lead. RESULTS: Ajmaline challenge was positive in 48 (47%) of the 103 cases. Baseline J wave elevation was greater in -2V(1) (0.077 +/- 0.078 mV vs. 0.038 +/- 0.046 mV, P = 0.003) and -2V(2) (0.149 +/- 0.103 mV vs. 0.043 +/- 0.088 mV, P < 0.001) in cases with a subsequent positive response. In contrast, ST segment elevation and T wave amplitudes were reduced in V(1), V(2) and V(3). Logistic regression showed that J wave elevation in -2V(2) and decreased T wave amplitude in V(3) at baseline were independent predictors of a positive response. Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) had a specificity of 100%, a sensitivity of 40%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 28%. CONCLUSION: J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) was the strongest predictor of a Brugada type response to Na channel blockade challenge when Brugada syndrome was suspected on a baseline ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HERMIDA et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Suspected Brugada syndrome (n=103). Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) vs. Absence of baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) was evaluated on Positive Brugada type response during Na channel blockade challenge. Baseline J wave elevation >0.16 mV in -2V(2) strongly predicted a Brugada type response to ajmaline challenge, demonstrating 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: