Key result
Manual vasopressor therapy resulted in similar mean arterial pressures between OR and ICU settings (80 vs 80 mmHg; 95% CI -6 to 6; P=0.996), with patients spending 48.8% of time in the 60-80 mmHg range.
Why the study?
Achieving tightly controlled feedback with manual vasopressor titration is difficult, and few studies have examined blood pressure control during manual administration in OR and ICU patients.
Observational (n=3,623)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 80%
p-value: p=0.996
Manual titration of vasopressors in OR and ICU patients results in significant blood pressure variability, highlighting the potential utility of closed-loop administration systems.
BP variability persists with manual vasopressor titration across OR and ICU; hypothesis-generating for closed-loop systems, needing prospective trials.
Blood pressure management in the operating rooms (OR) and intensive care units (ICU) frequently involves manually titrated vasopressor therapy to an optimal range of mean arterial pressure (MAP). Ideally, changes in vasopressor infusion rates have to quickly follow variations in blood pressure measurements. However, such a tightly controlled feedback loop is difficult to achieve. Few studies have examined blood pressure control when vasopressor therapy is administered manually in OR and ICU patients. We extracted MAP data from 3623 patients (2530 from the ORs and 1093 from the ICU) on vasopressors from our electronic medical records. Coefficient of variation (= standard deviation/mean value) *100) was calculated and the values were additionally categorized into different MAP ranges (MAP < 60 mmHg, 60 < MAP < 80 and MAP > 80 mmHg). There was no statistically significant difference between both centres for MAP across all time points (80 ± 12 vs. 80 ± 16, P = 0.996, 95% CI -6 to 6). The coefficients of variation of MAP were 13.7 ± 5.4% and 18.4 ± 9.8% in the OR and in ICU respectively. Patients on vasopressors spent 48.8% treatment time with a MAP between 60 and 80 mmHg (11.2% time with MAP < 60 mmHg, and 40% with MAP > 80 mmHg). These results provide a reasonable baseline from which to establish whether 'reduced variability' may be achieved with a closed-loop vasopressor administration system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rinehart et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Patients requiring vasopressor therapy (n=3,623). Manual vasopressor therapy vs. Operating room vs. Intensive care unit was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (MAP) across all time points (95% CI -6 to 6, p=0.996). Manual vasopressor therapy resulted in similar mean arterial pressures between OR and ICU settings (80 vs 80 mmHg; 95% CI -6 to 6; P=0.996), with patients spending 48.8% of time in the 60-80 mmHg range.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: