Key result
Future comparative studies are needed to determine whether minimally invasive cardiac surgery offers advantages in recovery and morbidity beyond aesthetic benefits.
Highlights the growing importance of cosmetic and psychological outcomes in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, calling for future comparative studies.
The initial focus of the pioneering cardiac surgeons was appropriately centered on survival as opposed to cosmetic results. A variety of minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to perform cardiac operations through a limited incision. As the results in cardiac surgery improved, cosmetic and psychological implications of surgery become more important in the evaluation of the morbidity of these procedures. Future comparative studies will be mandatory to show whether these small incisions have an actual advantage on recovery or morbidity or whether their interest is entirely aesthetic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massetti et al. (1999) conducted a review in cardiac surgery. minimally invasive cardiac surgery was evaluated. Future comparative studies are needed to determine whether minimally invasive cardiac surgery offers advantages in recovery and morbidity beyond aesthetic benefits.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: