Key result
Lifestyle-induced weight loss ≥2% is linked to better VO2 peak, NYHA status, and fewer HFNEF rehospitalizations.
Why the study?
Does successful lifestyle modification improve cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, diastolic function, and clinical outcomes in patients with HFNEF and cardiometabolic syndrome?
Cohort (n=40)
Does successful lifestyle modification improve cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, diastolic function, and clinical outcomes in patients with HFNEF and cardiometabolic syndrome?
Successful lifestyle modification achieving ≥2% weight loss improves exercise capacity, diastolic function, and clinical outcomes in patients with HFNEF and cardiometabolic syndrome.
May support lifestyle modification in HFNEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (HFNEF) accounts for about one third of all heart failure patients with considerable mortality. The metabolic syndrome (MS) is a risk factor for diastolic dysfunction and HFNEF. We hypothesized that modifying metabolic burden by exercise training and weight loss might improve left ventricular diastolic function, heart failure symptoms and rehospitalization rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with HFNEF, MS and prediabetes were enrolled in this prospective study. Echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were done at baseline and after 3 months lifestyle modification (LSM). NT-pro BNP and adiponectin were determined at baseline as both peptidehormones play a crucial role in MS and heart failure. After discharge a 3-month LSM program with the aim of weight reduction by diet and exercise was started. After the intervention period a weight reduction of ≥ 2% was defined as successful LSM (group A = 23 patients), while a weight reduction < 2% was classified as unsuccessful LSM (group B = 17 patients). At baseline NT-pro BNP (424 ± 381 versus 121 ± 99 pg/ml, P < 0.01) and adiponectin (10.1 ± 6.2 versus 4.6-2.0 µg/ml, P < 0.01) were higher in group A than in group B. After 3 months of LSM, CPET showed a significant improve- ment of VO2 peak (P < 0.01), EqCO2 (P < 0.001), O2-pulse (P = 0.02) and VE / VCO2 slope (P = 0.01) in group A. After one year of follow-up a modest but significant reduction of left atrial size and mitral flow to mitral annulus velocity ratio E/E' was seen in group A. LSM resulted in significant improvement of NYHA status (P = 0.03) and higher freedom of rehospitalization (P = 0.04) in group A. CONCLUSION: Successful lifestyle modification in obese, prediabetic patients with HFNEF improves diastolic left ventricular function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. As these measures result in improved NYHA status and less hospitalization, LSM might be a promising approach to prevent chronic diastolic heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ritzel et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with normal ejection fraction, metabolic syndrome, and prediabetes (n=40). Successful lifestyle modification (weight reduction ≥ 2%) vs. Unsuccessful lifestyle modification (weight reduction < 2%) was evaluated on Cardiopulmonary exercise capacity (VO2 peak), NYHA status, and rehospitalization. Successful lifestyle modification (≥2% weight reduction) significantly improved VO2 peak (P<0.01), NYHA status (P=0.03), and freedom from rehospitalization (P=0.04) in patients with HFNEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: