Key result
Cardiac transplantation was associated with significant myocyte hypertrophy at 3 years (mean width 20.2 vs 11.8 microns in controls, P<0.001), but distant procurement and cyclosporine had no effect.
Why the study?
Does distant donor heart procurement or cyclosporine treatment increase the risk of myocardial hypertrophy, vascularity changes, and fibrosis in long-term cardiac transplant recipients?
Observational (n=115)
Does distant donor heart procurement or cyclosporine treatment increase the risk of myocardial hypertrophy, vascularity changes, and fibrosis in long-term cardiac transplant recipients?
Myocyte hypertrophy is typical in transplanted hearts at 3 years, but distant procurement (ischemic time <3 hours) and cyclosporine do not significantly worsen hypertrophy or fibrosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypertrophy develops in transplanted hearts by 3 years independent of procurement distance or cyclosporine; leaves open other drivers of chronic allograft remodeling.
Myocyte hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis have been observed in transplanted human hearts, and both could potentially have an adverse effect on long-term cardiac function. There has been some concern that distant donor heart procurement and cyclosporine treatment increase the risk of these changes, but their incidence and severity have not been documented quantitatively in large numbers of cardiac transplant recipients. We used light microscopic morphometric methods to estimate myocardial collagen volume fraction and myocyte width in right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies from 95 recipients at 3 years posttransplantation, and electron microscopic stereology to estimate myocardial vascularity and myocyte myofibril content in 40 recipients, also at 3 years posttransplantation. We compared those with locally and distantly procured donor hearts (mean ischemic time 160 minutes) and cyclosporine versus noncyclosporine immunosuppression. Controls were pretransplant right ventricular biopsies from 20 donor hearts which were free of heart disease. We found no significant differences in myocardial collagen volume fractions. Myocyte hypertrophy was typical of all the transplant biopsies (mean myocyte width 20.2 microns, SD 3.0 in all transplants versus 11.8 microns, SD 2.2 in controls, P less than 0.001), but distant donor procurement and cyclosporine had no significant effect. There were significant reductions of myofibril volume fraction in the transplants, which raises the possibility of gradual decompensation in some patients. There were no significant differences in myocardial vascularity, although a few patients were well below the control range. We conclude that distant donor heart procurement, with ischemic times averaging less than 3 hours, and cyclosporine treatment are not responsible for significant hypertrophy or fibrosis in most transplants. Hypertrophy is typical of the transplanted heart, and it is possible that associated abnormalities might have an effect on cardiac function in some long-term survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowan et al. (1990) conducted an observational in Cardiac transplant recipients (n=115). Cardiac transplantation (including distant procurement and cyclosporine) vs. Pretransplant donor hearts (controls) was evaluated on Myocyte width (p=<0.001). Cardiac transplantation was associated with significant myocyte hypertrophy at 3 years (mean width 20.2 vs 11.8 microns in controls, P<0.001), but distant procurement and cyclosporine had no effect.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: