Key result
Fiberoptic TAVR guidewire shows moderate agreement with pigtail catheters for post-TAVR mean pressure gradients.
Why the study?
A novel fiberoptic TAVR guidewire was developed for continuous hemodynamic monitoring, pacing, and prosthesis guiding, but the construct validity of its pressure measurements compared to conventional catheters needed evaluation.
Does a novel fiberoptic TAVR guidewire provide valid hemodynamic measurements compared to conventional fluid-filled pigtail catheters in patients undergoing TAVR?
Observational (n=150)
Does a novel fiberoptic TAVR guidewire provide valid hemodynamic measurements compared to conventional fluid-filled pigtail catheters in patients undergoing TAVR?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.67
A novel fiberoptic TAVR guidewire provides valid hemodynamic measurements with fewer artefacts compared to conventional pigtail catheters, supporting its potential to streamline invasive assessment during TAVR.
Should not yet change catheter choice post-TAVR; leaves open validation of fiberoptic guidewire accuracy in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: A novel fiberoptic transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) guidewire was developed that enables continuous hemodynamic monitoring, easy pacing over the wire, and guiding of the valve prosthesis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate construct validity of hemodynamic measurements obtained with the fiberoptic TAVR guidewire compared to conventional fluid-filled pigtail catheters. METHODS: This prospective registry study included patients undergoing TAVR. Complete hemodynamic assessment was performed in-duplo with the fiberoptic TAVR guidewire and conventional pigtail catheters. Primary endpoint was the agreement between modalities for post-TAVR mean pressure gradient (PG). Secondary endpoints included agreement in assessing paravalvular regurgitation and in-depth signal analysis using a validated automated algorithm. RESULTS: This study included 150 patients (mean age 79.7 ± 5.8 years; 46.7% female). Comparison of invasive pressure measurements yielded moderate to excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]-range: 0.65 to 0.95). Bias was observed in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), with the fiberoptic guidewire measuring higher LVEDPs (+3.5 mm Hg). Post-TAVR mean PG showed a mean absolute difference of 2.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg (ICC: 0.67), minimal bias (-0.45 mm Hg), and 87% concordance with a discrete cutoff (10 mm Hg). Good overall agreement was observed for most indices of paravalvular regurgitation (ICC-range: 0.81-0.87). Automated algorithm assessment revealed fewer artefacts and calibration errors for the fiberoptic guidewire (P = 0.048), repeat analysis improved mean PG agreement (ICC-range: 0.80-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The fiberoptic guidewire effectively classified clinically relevant transvalvular gradients with limited bias post-TAVR, although it produced higher LVEDPs, possibly reflecting wire-induced leaflet interaction. Algorithm-derived assessment revealed the fiberoptic guidewire producing measurements with fewer artefacts and calibration errors, supporting its proof-of-concept potential to complement current invasive assessment standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Versteeg et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing TAVR (n=150). Fiberoptic TAVR guidewire vs. Conventional fluid-filled pigtail catheters was evaluated on Agreement between modalities for post-TAVR mean pressure gradient (PG) (ICC 0.67). The fiberoptic TAVR guidewire showed moderate agreement with conventional pigtail catheters for post-TAVR mean pressure gradient (ICC 0.67, mean absolute difference 2.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: