Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure by 4.99 mmHg (95% CI -5.55 to -4.43) compared to baseline in patients with HFpEF-PH.
Why the study?
Prior studies have not fully characterized the haemodynamic effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension?
Mean Difference: -4.99 (95% CI -5.55–-4.43)
Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure and improved functional capacity, lung congestion, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF and pulmonary hypertension.
Sacubitril/valsartan may reduce mPAP and improve symptoms in HFpEF-PH; leaves open efficacy on outcomes pending randomized trials.
AIMS: Prior studies have not fully characterized the haemodynamic effects of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension (HFpEF-PH). The aim of the Treatment of PH With Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Neprilysin Inhibitor in HFpEF Patients With CardioMEMS Device (ARNIMEMS-HFpEF) study is to assess pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) dynamics by means of implanted PAP monitors in patients with HFpEF-PH treated with sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-arm, investigator-initiated, interventional study included 14 consecutive ambulatory symptomatic HFpEF-PH patients who underwent CardioMEMS implantation prior to enrolment [mean ejection fraction 60.4 ± 7.2%, baseline mean PAP (mPAP) 33.9 ± 7.6 mmHg]. Daily PAP values were examined during three periods: a 6 week period after CardioMEMS implantation and before sacubitril/valsartan treatment (pre-ARNI), a 6 week period with sacubitril/valsartan treatment (ARNI ON), and a 6 week period of sacubitril/valsartan withdrawal (ARNI OFF). The primary endpoint was change in mPAP with and without sacubitril/valsartan. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6 min walking distance, B-line sum in lung ultrasound, and quality of life (QoL). During the study period, 1717 mPAP measurements were recorded. Between pre-ARNI vs. ARNI ON, mPAP significantly declined by -4.99 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.55 to -4.43]. Between ARNI ON vs. ARNI OFF, mPAP significantly increased by +2.84 mmHg [95% CI +2.26 to +3.42]. Between pre-ARNI vs. ARNI ON, we found an improvement in 6 min walking distance, B-lines, and QoL. Mean loop diuretic management did not differ between periods. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced mPAP in patients with HFpEF-PH, independent of loop diuretic management, together with improvement in functional capacity, lung congestion, and QoL. Sacubitril/valsartan may be a therapeutic alternative in HFpEF-PH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Codina et al. (2022) studied Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension (HFpEF-PH) (n=14). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Pre-treatment baseline and post-withdrawal was evaluated on Change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) with and without sacubitril/valsartan (MD -4.99 mmHg, 95% CI -5.55 to -4.43). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure by 4.99 mmHg (95% CI -5.55 to -4.43) compared to baseline in patients with HFpEF-PH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: