Key result
Random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio provides comparable accuracy to 24-hour urine levels for diagnosing primary aldosteronism.
Why the study?
Does random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to 24-h urinary aldosterone levels in diagnosing primary aldosteronism?
Observational (n=167)
Yes
Does random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to 24-h urinary aldosterone levels in diagnosing primary aldosteronism?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.77% vs 0.781%
p-value: p=0.726
Random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio offers a simpler, comparable alternative to 24-hour urinary aldosterone levels for confirming primary aldosteronism.
BACKGROUND: Historically, urinary aldosterone level measurement was a commonly employed confirmatory test to detect primary aldosteronism (PA). However, 24-h urine collection is inconvenient and cumbersome. We hypothesized that random urinary aldosterone measurements with correction for creatinine concentration might be comparable to 24-h urinary aldosterone levels (Uald-24 h) in the diagnosis of PA. METHODS: The non-concurrent prospective study was conducted between June 2006 and March 2008 in patients admitted for confirmation of aldosteronism by salt loading test. A 24-h urine sample, which was collected during hospitalization on the day before saline infusion testing after restoration of serum hypokalemia, was collected from all subjects. Moreover, participants were asked to collect a first bladder voiding random urine sample during clinic visits. Uald-24 h and the random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) were calculated accordingly. RESULTS: A total of 102 PA patients (71 patients diagnosed of aldosterone-producing adenoma, 31 with idiopathic hyperaldosteronism) and 65 patients with EH were enrolled. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed comparable areas under the curves of UACR and Uald-24 h. The Bland-Altman plot showed mean bias but no obvious heteroscedasticity between the two tests. When using random UACR >3.0 ng/mg creatinine as the cutoff value, we obtained a specificity of 90.6% to confirm PA from essential hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reinforce that the diagnostic accuracy of random UACR was comparable to that of Uald-24 h in PA patients. With the quickness and simplicity of the UACR method and its equivalence to Uald-24 h, this assay could be a good alternative diagnostic tool for PA confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Primary Aldosteronism (n=167). Random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) vs. 24-h urinary aldosterone level (Uald-24 h) was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for differentiating primary aldosteronism from essential hypertension (p=0.726). Random urinary aldosterone-to-creatinine ratio demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.77) to 24-h urinary aldosterone level (AUC 0.781) for differentiating primary aldosteronism from essential hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: