Key result
Distal embolization complicates ~16% of primary PCIs and reduces myocardial reperfusion effectiveness in early presenters.
Why the study?
What are the predictors of distal embolization during primary PCI and how does it impact myocardial reperfusion and necrosis based on time-to-treatment?
Population
400 consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI)
Comparison
Distal embolization (DE) during p-PCI vs No distal embolization during p-PCI
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Distal embolization may impair early reperfusion; leaves open whether thrombus-directed strategies improve outcomes in primary PCI.
Cohort (n=400)
What are the predictors of distal embolization during primary PCI and how does it impact myocardial reperfusion and necrosis based on time-to-treatment?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Distal embolization during primary PCI is predicted by high thrombus burden and worsens myocardial reperfusion and damage particularly when time-to-treatment is short (<6 hours).
Napodano et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI (n=400). Distal embolization during primary PCI vs. No distal embolization was evaluated on Impact of distal embolization on TIMI flow, myocardial blush, and troponin I according to time-to-treatment (p=<0.0001). Distal embolization during primary PCI occurred in 16% of patients and significantly reduced myocardial reperfusion effectiveness when time-to-treatment was ≤6 hours (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: