Key result
No abstract or key finding is available for this study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May simplify functional assessment of unilateral renal artery stenosis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jul 1965Differential Renal Studies in the Diagnosis of Hypertension Due to Renal Arterial Stenosis: Validity of Calculating Comparative Urinary Volume Reduction from the Comparative Urinary Creatinine Concentrations Robert Birchall, and Hugh M. Batson Robert BirchallRobert Birchall More articles by this author , and Hugh M. BatsonHugh M. Batson More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63556-0AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1965 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 94Issue 1July 1965Page: 4-6 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1965 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Robert Birchall More articles by this author Hugh M. Batson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birchall et al. (1965) studied Hypertension Due to Renal Arterial Stenosis. Calculating Comparative Urinary Volume Reduction from the Comparative Urinary Creatinine Concentrations was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: