Key result
Neuman Model-based care reduces pre-discharge stressor scores by ~53% vs control in CABG patients.
Why the study?
Coronary artery bypass grafting is a major treatment for coronary artery disease but causes significant stress in patients, prompting evaluation of the Neuman model to moderate stressors.
Does a Neuman Model-based intervention reduce stressors in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft?
RCT (n=64)
Randomized using cards A and B
No
Does a Neuman Model-based intervention reduce stressors in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft?
Absolute Event Rate: 24.87% vs 52.49%
p-value: p=<0.001
A Neuman-based intervention program can effectively moderate stressors and reduce stress in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft.
Neuman-based intervention lowers pre-CABG stress; confirms model efficacy in cardiac surgery and supports integration into perioperative nursing care.
Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the major causes of mortality all over the world. In this relation, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most important treatments for CAD patients. However, it leads to a lot of stress in the patient. The aim of this study was to use the Neuman model to moderate the stressors in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. Methods: This study was a randomized clinical trial of two groups performed on patients admitted to the coronary artery bypass graft; and the study completed with 64 patients. The intervention was performed by the researcher according to the format of the Neuman Model, which included the investigation of the stressors, and the determination of the goals and strategies for the actions. Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and extra personal factors were evaluated using a Revised Cardiac Surgery Stressor Scale (RCSSS). The intervention program was designed by the researcher based on prevention levels using scientific resources. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS ver. 13 using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Before the intervention, the mean score of the stressors was not significantly different between the two groups. But immediately after the intervention and before discharging the intervention group, it was significantly less than the control group. Conclusion: Using a Neuman-based program as an effective and low-cost intervention can moderate the stressors and reduce the stress of patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft. This theory can be a good guide to offering the roles needed to provide health services in the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akhlaghi et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease awaiting CABG (n=64). Betty Neuman System Model-based care program vs. Control group was evaluated on Mean score of stressors before discharge (p=<0.001). A care program based on the Betty Neuman System Model significantly reduced the mean score of stressors before discharge compared to the control group (24.87 vs 52.49, p<0.001) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: