Key result
Home cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved physical (47.46 vs 43.28) and mental (50.68 vs 48.26) SF-12 scores compared to control in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
This study aimed to investigate the effect of home cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life and psychological well-being in patients with coronary heart disease after PCI.
Does home cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life and psychological well-being in patients with coronary heart disease after PCI?
Population
106 patients after PCI
Comparison
Home cardiac rehabilitation vs control
Design
Randomized controlled study
Follow-up
3 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports home cardiac rehabilitation in post-PCI care to improve quality of life; extends randomized evidence for accessible rehabilitation models.
RCT (n=106)
randomly divided
Does home cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life and psychological well-being in patients with coronary heart disease after PCI?
Home cardiac rehabilitation significantly improves physical and mental quality of life in patients recovering from percutaneous coronary intervention.
Zheng et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (n=106). Home cardiac rehabilitation (HCR) vs. Control group was evaluated on Short-form health survey (SF-12) scores (physical and mental component summaries). Home cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved physical (47.46 vs 43.28) and mental (50.68 vs 48.26) SF-12 scores compared to control in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: