Key result
Leads I, II, III, and V5 achieve 100% accuracy detecting intravascular epinephrine using T-wave criteria.
Why the study?
Does the choice of EKG lead affect the efficacy of the T-wave criterion for detecting intravascular injection of an epinephrine test dose in anesthetized patients?
Does the choice of EKG lead affect the efficacy of the T-wave criterion for detecting intravascular injection of an epinephrine test dose in anesthetized patients?
EKG Leads I, II, III, and V5 are equally sensitive and specific for detecting intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing test dose using the T-wave criterion in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simplifies lead selection for T-wave monitoring of epidural test doses; extends prior data but leaves generalizability to other anesthetics open.
UNLABELLED: Accidental intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing test dose decreases the T-wave amplitude of a Lead II electrocardiogram (EKG) with 100% sensitivity and specificity on the basis of the T-wave criterion (positive if there is a > or =25% decrease in amplitude). We designed this study to test whether the choice of EKG lead would affect the efficacy of the simulated intravascular test dose in anesthetized patients. After an 8-h fast and no premedication, 35 healthy patients were anesthetized with end-tidal 2% sevoflurane and nitrous oxide after endotracheal intubation. When hemodynamic stability was obtained, all subjects received 3 mL of normal saline IV, followed 4 min later by 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL plus 15 microg of epinephrine (1:200,000) IV. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, Leads II (n = 35) and V(5) (n = 35), and either Lead I (n = 17) or III (n = 18), whichever had the greater T-wave amplitude, were continuously recorded for 4 min after the saline and test-dose injections. An IV test dose produced significant increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and produced decreases in the T-wave amplitude of all EKG leads studied in all subjects, whereas IV saline elicited no changes in these variables. The maximum percentage decreases in T-wave amplitude of Leads II, I, III, and V(5) were -87% +/- 13%, -88% +/- 8%, -94% +/- 15%, and -86% +/- 16%, respectively (mean +/- SD; P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in temporal changes in T-wave amplitude among the 4 leads, and sensitivity and specificity were 100% on the basis of the T-wave criterion, irrespective of the lead examined. Our results indicate that Leads II, I, III, and V(5) of the EKG are equally effective for detecting intravascular injection of the epinephrine-containing test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults. IMPLICATIONS: To determine whether an epidural catheter is in a blood vessel, an epidural test dose containing 15 microg of epinephrine is used. We found that decreases in the T-wave amplitude of Leads I, II, III, and V(5) of the electrocardiogram were equally sensitive and specific for detecting intravascular injection of the test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized adult patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2002) studied Healthy anesthetized patients (n=35). Intravascular injection of an epinephrine test dose vs. Normal saline IV was evaluated on Maximum percentage decrease in T-wave amplitude across EKG leads (p=> 0.05). Leads I, II, III, and V5 were equally effective (100% sensitivity and specificity) for detecting intravascular injection of an epinephrine test dose using the T-wave criterion in anesthetized adults.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: