Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Much contemporary talk of virtual 'worlds' proceeds as if the virtual could somehow be considered as in competition with or as an alternative to the world of the 'nonvirtual' or the 'everyday'. This article argues that such a contrast is fundamentally mistaken, and that the virtual is not autonomous with respect to the everyday, but is rather embedded within it, and an extension of it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeff Malpas (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: