Key result
Hybrid FIR filter and machine learning architecture improves signal-to-noise ratio by ~32% for better abnormality recognition.
Why the study?
During extraction of EEG signals, artifacts may mislead decision-making environments, requiring noise removal via FIR filters for accuracy.
Effect estimate: 32% enhancement
The proposed hybrid FIR filter design on FPGA improves EEG signal quality by enhancing SNR by 32% and abnormality recognition by 69%.
Virtual Reality (VR) technology assists physically challenged personnel in their daily routine activities. The evolution of technology has enhanced the critical activities of people who use wheelchairs by extracting features through electroencephalogram (EEG) and promoting options for their choice for decision-making on their own. During extraction of EEG, signal artifacts may mislead the decision-making environment. Hence noise has to be removed with help of an FIR filter for accuracy. In this context utilization of finite impulse response (FIR) filters are so vital hence filters are incorporated with the hidden Markov model (HMM) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and supervised machine learning architecture of multirate support vector machine (SVM). The proposed EEG-based diagnosis system is a fully automated audio announcement system. The entire environment has been developed by Verilog HDL and MATLAB. Validated on Artix-7 FPGA development board and synthesized with Vivado Design Suite 2018.1. Obtained results exhibit an enhancement of 32% of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),7% of mean square error (MSE), and 69% of abnormality recognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srinivasa et al. (2022) studied EEG signal noise and abnormalities (n=10). Hybrid FIR filter with HMM, GMM, and SVM vs. Existing methods was evaluated on Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) enhancement (32% enhancement). The proposed hybrid FIR filter and machine learning architecture enhanced the signal-to-noise ratio by 32%, mean square error by 7%, and abnormality recognition by 69%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: