Key result
D-Dimer provides high diagnostic accuracy for acute decompensated heart failure without added benefit from NT-proBNP.
Why the study?
Abnormalities in coagulation and inflammation occur in heart failure, motivating a comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP and D-Dimer and their correlation with echocardiographic parameters in acute decompensated heart failure.
Does D-Dimer provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to NT-proBNP in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=415)
No
Does D-Dimer provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to NT-proBNP in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
D-Dimer shows comparable diagnostic accuracy to NT-proBNP in acute decompensated heart failure, but lacks correlation with echocardiographic parameters, suggesting an independent pathophysiological mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
D-Dimer may aid ADHF diagnosis but should not change practice; leaves open prospective validation of its accuracy.
Purpose Abnormalities in coagulation and inflammation exist in heart failure. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP and D-Dimer and the correlation of these biomarkers with echocardiographic parameters in acute decompensated heart failure.Methods A retrospective cross-sectional/observational study was performed using 162 patients with acute decompensated heart failure and 253 age-matched controls. Patients were ruled out for a pulmonary embolus by CT or VQ scans. The study protocol was approved by Institutional Review Board, Lubbock, TX. Correlation of NT-proBNP and D-Dimer values was done with echocardiographic parameters. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05.Results D-Dimer showed a positive correlation with NT-proBNP (r = 0.665, p = 001). The AUC for NT-proBNP, D-Dimer and a combination of D-Dimer plus NT-proBNP were 0.963, 0.928 and 0.982 respectively. The AUC value for D-Dimer versus the combination of D-Dimer and NT-roBNP was not significant (p = 0.21). Correlation of NT-proBNP was significant with the echocardiographic parameters but D-Dimer did not significantly correlate with any of the echocardiographic parameters studied.Conclusions Comparison of the AUC values for D-Dimer versus the combination of D-Dimer and NT-proBNP showed no significance suggestive of comparable diagnostic accuracy in the study population. The lack of correlation between D-Dimer and echocardiographic parameters suggests an independent pathophysiological mechanism underlying upregulation of D-Dimer in acute decompensated heart failure. Further systematic studies are needed to define mechanism of D-Dimer increase in heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nair et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in acute decompensated heart failure (n=415). D-Dimer and NT-proBNP vs. Age-matched controls was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for acute decompensated heart failure (AUC 0.928 for D-Dimer, 0.982 for combination, p=0.21). D-Dimer demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for acute decompensated heart failure (AUC 0.928), which was not significantly different from its combination with NT-proBNP (AUC 0.982, p=0.21).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: