Key result
Less than full-time anaesthesia training was associated with a similar rate of appointment to a substantive consultant post compared to full-time training (96% vs 95%, p=0.82).
Why the study?
Does less than full-time training compared to full-time training affect the likelihood of consultant appointment and length of training in anaesthesia trainees?
Cohort
Yes
Does less than full-time training compared to full-time training affect the likelihood of consultant appointment and length of training in anaesthesia trainees?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 95%
p-value: p=0.82
Less than full-time training does not negatively impact the likelihood of being appointed to a substantive consultant post in anaesthesia, though training length for all trainees exceeds current workforce planning estimates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Less than full-time training appears viable for consultant progression in anaesthesia; supports training flexibility but leaves duration and workforce effects open.
Randive et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Anaesthesia training. Less than full-time training vs. Full-time training was evaluated on Appointment to a substantive consultant post (p=0.82). Less than full-time anaesthesia training was associated with a similar rate of appointment to a substantive consultant post compared to full-time training (96% vs 95%, p=0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: