Key result
High negative affectivity in CRT patients is linked to worse health status and more cardiac symptoms.
Why the study?
Does negative affectivity modulate the improvement in patient-reported outcomes and functional capacity in CHF patients treated with CRT?
Observational (n=31)
Does negative affectivity modulate the improvement in patient-reported outcomes and functional capacity in CHF patients treated with CRT?
p-value: p=0.046
Personality traits, specifically negative affectivity, negatively modulate the improvement in patient-reported health status and perceived disability following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Should not yet guide CRT decisions; hypothesis-generating for negative affectivity screening or intervention.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a promising treatment in chronic heart failure (CHF). However, a subgroup of patients still report impaired health status, cardiac symptoms, and feelings of disability following CRT. The aims of this study were to examine (1) whether CHF patients treated with CRT improved in patient-centered outcomes and functional capacity, and (2) whether personality traits exert a stable effect on these outcomes over two months. METHODS: Analyses are based on 31 patients (65% male; mean age 70 +/- 8) with CHF treated with CRT. Two weeks before and two months after CRT, patients completed the Type-D Scale (negative affectivity, i.e., tendency to experience negative emotions, and social inhibition, i.e., tendency to inhibit self-expression), the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (disease-specific health status), and the Health Complaints Scale (cardiac symptoms and perceived disability), and performed the six-minute walking test (functional capacity). RESULTS: There was an improvement in disease-specific health status (P< 0.001), cardiac symptoms (P = 0.001), perceived disability (P< 0.001), and functional capacity (P = 0.007) in all patients over two months. However, high negative affectivity patients reported significantly lower disease-specific health status (P = 0.046), and more cardiac symptoms (P = 0.035), and perceived disability (P = 0.015) as compared to low negative affectivity patients. There was no significant main effect for negative affectivity on functional capacity. High negative affectivity patients still reported lower disease-specific health status (P = 0.06) and significantly more perceived disability (P = 0.04) when adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction, gender, and age. The effects of negative affectivity on patient-centered outcomes, as measured by Cohen's effect size index, were moderate to large. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered outcomes improved over a two-month period in patients treated with CRT, but negative affectivity exerted a stable, negative effect on health status, cardiac symptoms, and perceived disability. Personality traits should be taken into account when evaluating effects of CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiffer et al. (2007) conducted an observational in chronic heart failure (n=31). High negative affectivity vs. Low negative affectivity was evaluated on disease-specific health status (p=0.046). In patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy, high negative affectivity was associated with significantly lower disease-specific health status (P=0.046) and more cardiac symptoms (P=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: