Key result
Higher resistance to physical fatigue score was associated with a lower risk of cardiac death in chronic heart failure (adjusted HR 0.86 per 10 units increase; 95% CI 0.75-0.98; P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does subjective assessment of physical functioning predict cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cohort (n=178)
Does subjective assessment of physical functioning predict cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure?
Subjective assessment of resistance to physical fatigue provides independent prognostic value for long-term survival in patients with chronic heart failure.
May refine prognosis via fatigue scores in chronic HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life tools that better reflect the unique subjective perception of heart failure (HF) are needed for patients with this disorder. The aim of this study was to explore whether subjective satisfaction of HF patients about daily life may provide additional prognostic information with respect to clinical cardiological data. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-eight patients (age 51 ± 9 years) with moderate to severe HF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2.0 ± 0.7; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 29 ± 8%] in stable clinical condition underwent a standard clinical evaluation and compiled the Satisfaction Profile (SAT-P) questionnaire focusing on subjective satisfaction with daily life. Cox regression analysis was used to assess whether SAT-P factors (psychological functioning, physical functioning, work, sleep/eating/leisure, social functioning) had any prognostic value. RESULTS: Forty-six cardiac deaths occurred during a median of 30 months. Patients who died had higher NYHA class, more depressed left ventricular function, reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP), increased heart rate (HR), and worse biochemistry (all p < 0.05). Among the SAT-P factors, only physical functioning (PF) was significantly reduced in the patients who died (p = 0.003). Using the best subset selection procedure, resistance to physical fatigue (RPF) was selected from among the items of the PF factor. RPF showed independent predictive value when entered into a prognostic model including NYHA class, LVEF, SBP, and HR with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.86 per 10 units increase (95% CI 0.75-0.98, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' dissatisfaction with physical functioning is associated with reduced long-term survival, after adjustment for known risk factors in HF. Given its user-friendly structure, simplicity, and significant prognostic value, the RPF score may represent a useful instrument in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majani et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (n=178). Resistance to physical fatigue (RPF) score was evaluated on Cardiac death (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, p=0.02). Higher resistance to physical fatigue score was associated with a lower risk of cardiac death in chronic heart failure (adjusted HR 0.86 per 10 units increase; 95% CI 0.75-0.98; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: