BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether S-CARES is associated with respiratory infection-related hospitalisation in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. METHOD: This single-centre retrospective study involved 103 people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (mean age: 36 years; males: 60). Two physical therapists assessed them using the S-CARES at baseline and after 1 year. The primary outcome was respiratory infection-related hospitalisation. Associations were examined using logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Risk stratification was evaluated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Sixteen people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (15.5%) were hospitalised. Median S-CARES scores were higher in the hospitalised group (58.5 vs. 38.0; p < 0.001). Higher S-CARES scores were independently associated with hospitalisation (odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.14; p = 0.005; area under the curve = 0.777). CONCLUSIONS: Higher S-CARES scores may help identify people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities at increased risk, supporting early intervention and resource prioritisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oomagari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: