Key result
Higher waist-to-hip ratio linked to ~11-fold greater AMI risk in men.
Why the study?
Does upper-body adiposity increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction?
Case-Control (n=1,000)
Does upper-body adiposity increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 11.1 (95% CI 6–20.6)
Upper-body adiposity, measured by waist-to-hip ratio, is a strong, independent predictor of acute myocardial infarction risk, more so than BMI.
Waist-to-hip ratio may refine acute MI risk stratification beyond BMI; leaves open causality and whether targeting central adiposity alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The relation between obesity and coronary heart disease (CHD) has long been studied, but no convincing conclusion has been drawn. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative risk associated with upper-body adiposity which is at present believed to be a better predictor of CHD. DESIGN: This was a community-based case-control study. METHODS: We studied 338 consecutively admitted patients who had had their first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 662 community controls who had not suffered AMI selected as a random sample of adults living in the catchment area of the hospital. We defined three classes of body mass index (BMI) and waist: hip circumference ratio on the basis of tertiles of distribution for controls. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Separate models were built for men and women. RESULTS: In univariate analysis we found a higher risk of AMI for men and women with hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes and lower levels of education, for older women, for male smokers and for men with family histories of CHD. Both for men and for women a higher BMI was associated with a slightly higher risk, whereas the adjusted risk of AMI increased with increasing waist: hip circumference ratio [for men OR (second tertile)= 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.9 and OR (third tertile)= 11.1, 95% CI 6.0-20.6; for women OR (second tertile) = 3.0, 95% CI 0.6-14.8 and OR (third tertile) = 14.1,95% CI 3.2-62.7]. This relation held for each BMI class and was stronger for classes of lower BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Distribution of body fat rather than BMI is a strong marker of risk for AMI and there is a clear interaction between these two variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azevedo et al. (1999) conducted a case-control in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,000). Higher waist-to-hip circumference ratio vs. Lowest tertile of waist-to-hip circumference ratio was evaluated on Acute myocardial infarction (OR 11.1, 95% CI 6.0-20.6). Higher waist-to-hip ratio (third vs first tertile) was strongly associated with increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in men (OR 11.1; 95% CI 6.0-20.6) and women (OR 14.1; 95% CI 3.2-62.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: