Key result
Widely scattered VPC tachograms identify ventricular parasystole with ~171 msec longer coupling intervals than fixed patterns.
Why the study?
Does a dot distribution pattern on heart rate tachograms discriminate ventricular parasystole from fixed coupling interval VPCs in patients with frequent VPCs?
Observational (n=20)
Does a dot distribution pattern on heart rate tachograms discriminate ventricular parasystole from fixed coupling interval VPCs in patients with frequent VPCs?
Absolute Event Rate: 651% vs 480%
p-value: p=0.0002
A diagnostic method using dot distribution patterns on heart rate tachograms can effectively discriminate ventricular parasystole from fixed coupling interval VPCs.
Scattered tachogram dot patterns may aid parasystole identification in frequent VPCs; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation before clinical use.
INTRODUCTION: To discriminate ventricular parasystole from fixed coupling interval ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), we developed a new diagnostic method using a dot distribution pattern corresponding to VPCs recorded on a heart rate tachogram using ambulatory ECG monitoring data. We tested our hypothesis that widely scattered VPC dots on instantaneous heart rate tachograms indicate a constant VPC-VPC interval compatible with parasystole. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with frequent VPCs > 5,000/day) were divided into two groups depending on the tachogram dot distribution patterns: group S (n = 10, aged 61 +/- 16 years) showed widely scattered VPC dot distribution, whereas group F (n = 10, 60 +/- 17 years) showed fixed VPC dot distribution limited to a narrow zone. Using digitized R-R interval data, full-day heart rate tachograms and VPC-VPC intervals were depicted simultaneously. Group S demonstrated constant basic VPC-VPC intervals (1,285 to 2,052 msec, mean 1,738 +/- 219), with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.061 +/- 0.018. Their VPC coupling intervals were markedly variable (651 +/- 113 msec; CV = 0.193 +/- 0.034). Each patient's basic VPC-VPC intervals showed small diurnal alterations (minimum -13% +/- 3% to maximum +15% +/- 6%). VPC-VPC intervals in group F were not constant and showed marked variation. Group F VPC coupling intervals were shorter and constant (480 +/- 30 msec, P = 0.0002; with CV = 0.076 +/- 0.013, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Ventricular parasystole with constant VPC-VPC intervals consistently became evident based on VPC dot patterns recorded on heart rate tachograms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takayanagi et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Frequent ventricular premature complexes (n=20). Widely scattered VPC dot distribution pattern vs. Fixed VPC dot distribution pattern was evaluated on VPC coupling intervals (p=0.0002). A widely scattered VPC dot distribution pattern on heart rate tachograms identified ventricular parasystole, with longer coupling intervals than fixed patterns (651 vs 480 msec, P=0.0002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: