Key result
Endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix coating on LAAC devices yields thicker neoendocardium coverage versus uncoated devices in canines.
Why the study?
Anticoagulation is required for at least 45 days after LAAC device implantation until complete neoendocardium coverage, posing bleeding risks.
Does an endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix coating on LAAC devices enhance endothelialization in a canine LAA model?
Does an endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix coating on LAAC devices enhance endothelialization in a canine LAA model?
A novel endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix coating for LAAC devices enhances neoendocardium coverage in a canine model, potentially offering a strategy to shorten post-implantation anticoagulation.
Should not yet change post-LAAC anticoagulation; leaves open whether nanomatrix coatings accelerate endothelialization in humans.
Blood clots (90%) originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients and are a major cause of embolic stroke. Long-term anticoagulation therapy has been used to prevent thrombus formation, but its use is limited in patients at a high risk for bleeding complications. Thus, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices for LAA occlusion are well-established as an alternative to the anticoagulation therapy. However, the anticoagulation therapy is still required for at least 45 days post-implantation to bridge the time until complete LAA occlusion by neoendocardium coverage of the device. In this study, we applied an endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix to the LAAC device membrane for delivery of nitric oxide (NO) to enhance endothelialization, with the goal of possibly being able to reduce the duration of the anticoagulation therapy. The nanomatrix was uniformly coated on the LAAC device membranes and provided sustained release of NO for up to 1 month in vitro . In addition, the nanomatrix coating promoted endothelial cell proliferation and reduced platelet adhesion compared to the uncoated device membranes in vitro . The nanomatrix-coated and uncoated LAAC devices were then deployed in a canine LAA model for 22 days as a pilot study. All LAAC devices were not completely covered by neoendocardium 22 days post-implantation. However, histology image analysis showed that the nanomatrix-coated LAAC device had thicker neoendocardium coverage compared to the uncoated device. Therefore, our in vitro and in vivo results indicate that the nanomatrix coating has the potential to enhance endothelialization on the LAAC device membrane, which could improve patient outcomes by shortening the need for extended anticoagulation treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2021) studied Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (LAAC device implantation). Endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix coating vs. Uncoated LAAC device membranes was evaluated on Neoendocardium coverage and endothelialization. An endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix coating on LAAC devices resulted in thicker neoendocardium coverage compared to uncoated devices in a 22-day canine pilot study.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: