Key result
Saphenous vein PVAT exhibits larger adipocytes and less fibrosis than subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Why the study?
While harvesting the saphenous vein with surrounding tissue improves graft patency, the phenotypic differences between saphenous vein perivascular adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue remained unclear.
What are the phenotypic differences between perivascular adipose tissue surrounding the saphenous vein and subcutaneous adipose tissue in patients undergoing CABG?
Cross-Sectional (n=55)
Double-blind for image analysis
Yes
What are the phenotypic differences between perivascular adipose tissue surrounding the saphenous vein and subcutaneous adipose tissue in patients undergoing CABG?
p-value: p=<0.05
SV-PVAT exhibits healthy expansion with less fibrosis compared to SCAT, which may contribute to the good long-term patency of saphenous vein grafts harvested using the no-touch technique.
SV-PVAT phenotype may underlie no-touch graft durability; leaves open causal mechanisms and clinical translation.
BACKGROUND: The saphenous vein (SV) is used as an essential conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but the long-term patency of SV grafts is a crucial issue. The use of the novel "no-touch" technique of harvesting the SV together with its surrounding tissue has been reported to result in good long-term graft patency of SV grafts. We recently showed that perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) surrounding the SV (SV-PVAT) had lower levels of metaflammation and consecutive adipose tissue remodeling than did PVAT surrounding the coronary artery. However, the difference between SV-PVAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fat pads were sampled from 55 patients (38 men, 17 women; mean [±SD] age 71±8 years) with coronary artery disease who underwent elective CABG. Adipocyte size was significantly larger in SV-PVAT than SCAT. The extent of fibrosis was smaller in SV-PVAT than SCAT. There were no significant differences between SCAT and SV-PVAT in macrophage infiltration area, quantified by antibodies for CD68, CD11c, and CD206, or in gene expression levels of metaflammation-related markers. Expression patterns of adipocyte developmental and pattern-forming genes differed between SCAT and SV-PVAT. CONCLUSIONS: The properties of SV-PVAT are close to, but not the same as, those of SCAT, possibly resulting from inherent differences in adipocytes. SV-PVAT has healthy expansion with less fibrosis in fat than SCAT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikami et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=55). Perivascular adipose tissue surrounding the saphenous vein (SV-PVAT) vs. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) was evaluated on Adipocyte size and extent of fibrosis (p=<0.05). Perivascular adipose tissue surrounding the saphenous vein exhibited significantly larger adipocytes and less fibrosis compared to subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: